CalBike
  • About
  • Advocacy
    • 2025 Legislative Watch
    • Restore $400M to the ATP
    • Support the Quick-Build Pilot
    • Keep Bike Highways Moving
    • Sign-On Letters
    • 2025 Bike Month
  • Resources
    • News
    • Report: Incomplete Streets
    • Bicycle Summit Virtual Sessions
    • California Bicycle Laws
    • E-Bike Resources
    • Map & Routes
    • Quick-Build Bikeway Design Guide
  • Support
    • Become a Member
    • Business Member
    • Shop
  • Bike Month
  • Search
  • Menu Menu
  • About
  • Advocacy
    • Legislative Watch
    • Invest/Divest
    • Sign-On Letters
    • Report: Incomplete Streets
    • Bike the Vote
  • Resources
    • News
    • California Bicycle Laws
    • E-Bike Resources
    • Map & Routes
    • Quick-Build Bikeway Design Guide
  • Support
    • Become a CalBike Member
    • Business Member
    • Shop

CalBike Sponsors Senator Wiener’s Safe Streets Bills

January 24, 2024/by CalBike Staff

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

January 24, 2024

Contact: Jared Sanchez, CalBike, (714) 262-0921, Jared@CalBike.org

Senator Wiener Introduces Groundbreaking Bills to Slash California Road Deaths Epidemic

SACRAMENTO – Senator Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco) introduced the Speeding and Fatality Emergency Reduction on California Streets (SAFER California Streets) Package, Senate Bills 960 & 961, a first-in-the-nation effort to make California roads safe and accessible to all users. Senate Bill 961 requires changes to vehicles directly, including a first-in-the-nation requirement that all new vehicles sold in California install speed governors, smart devices that automatically limit the vehicle’s speed to 10 miles above the legal limit. SB 961 also requires side underride guards on trucks, to reduce the risk of cars and bikes being pulled underneath the truck during a crash.

Senate Bill 960 requires that Caltrans, the state transportation agency, make physical improvements like new crosswalks and curb extensions on state-owned surface streets to better accommodate pedestrians, cyclists, the disability community, and transit users.

These changes are a head-on attempt to tackle vehicle fatalities, which are surging across the U.S.—and especially in California—amid a rise in reckless driving since the onset of the pandemic. A recent report from TRIP, a national transportation research group, found that traffic fatalities in California have increased by 22% from 2019 to 2022, compared to 19% for the U.S. overall. In 2022, 4,400 Californians died in car crashes.

The rise in road deaths in the U.S. is a sharp contrast with reduced road fatalities across the developed world. A recent investigation by the New York Times found that “if the U.S. had made as much progress reducing vehicle crashes as other high-income countries had over the past two decades, about 25,000 fewer Americans would die every year.” Other nations are making progress to protect road users, while in the U.S. the problem grows steadily worse.

“The alarming surge in road deaths is unbearable and demands an urgent response,” said Senator Wiener. “There is no reason for anyone to be going over 100 miles per hour on a public road, yet in 2020, California Highway Patrol issued over 3,000 tickets for just that offense. Preventing reckless speeding is a commonsense approach to prevent these utterly needless and heartbreaking crashes.” 

“Additionally, many state-owned roads across the state need to be improved to accommodate all users, including pedestrians, cyclists, motorists, and public transit riders. State roads — which are often main streets in smaller towns — should be safe for anyone wishing to walk, bike, or wait for the bus – and we can do a lot better by requiring things like crosswalks, bike lanes, rapid bus lanes, and safe bus stops. Instead of leading the rise in traffic fatalities, California should be leading the nation in reducing needless deaths on our roadways. The SAFER California Streets Package allows us to reclaim that leadership for a safer and more sustainable future.”

Speed Kills

The chance of a fatal crash drastically increases when a driver is speeding. According to the California Office of Traffic Safety’s (OTS) 2023 Traffic Safety Report, one-third of all traffic fatalities in the state between 2017 and 2021 were speeding-related. The National Association of City  Transportation Officials (NACTO) notes that “a person hit by a car traveling at 35 miles per hour is five times more likely to die than a person hit by a car traveling at 20 miles per hour.”

Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, drivers have engaged in increasingly reckless behavior, putting themselves and others at risk. TRIP found a 23% increase in speeding-related crashes in California from 2019-2022.

What are Speed Governors?

Speed governors, also referred to as speed limiters or Intelligent Speed Assistance (ISA), are vehicle technologies that prevent vehicles from exceeding a certain speed. Intelligent Speed Assistance (ISA) refers to systems that use GPS technology and sometimes on-board cameras to determine the speed limit on a specific roadway, issuing driver warnings through audio, visual, or vibration signals and/or limiting vehicle speeds accordingly. 

The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has repeatedly recommended that car manufacturers install such technology in all new passenger vehicles in order to prevent fatal crashes. They have also called for the National Highway and Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) – the federal passenger vehicle safety regulator – to develop regulations requiring, at a minimum, intelligent speed assistance systems that warn a driver of a vehicle that they are speeding.

Speed governors will be required in all vehicles sold in the EU beginning July of this year. The devices must warn drivers when they have surpassed the legal speed limit of a specific roadway through alarms or accelerator resistance.

In the United States, multiple local jurisdictions – including Ventura County – have implemented aftermarket conversions of speed governors on their vehicle fleets. The New York City Department of City Administrative Services launched a pilot program in 2022, outfitting 50 vehicles in its vehicle fleet with speed governors. The NTSB has identified 18 major vehicle manufacturers – including Ford, BMW, Mercedes-Benz, and Nissan USA – that offer some form of speed governors on at least some vehicle models in the United States. With strengthened EU regulations set to go into effect in July 2024, it is likely that equipping vehicles with the technology as an optional feature in the United States will become the norm.

In line with NTSB recommendations, SB 961 requires every passenger vehicle, truck, and bus manufactured or sold in the state to be equipped with speed governors that limit the vehicle’s speed based on the speed limit for the roadway segment. The maximum speed threshold over the speed limit for that segment that the speed governor may permit the vehicle to travel at is 10 miles per hour over the speed limit. SB 961 also permits the vehicle operator to temporarily override the speed governor function. SB 961’s speed governor requirement does not apply to emergency vehicles. 

Furthermore, the bill allows the California Highway Patrol (CHP) to use its discretion to authorize the disabling of speed governors on vehicles based on the specialized use of the vehicle, provided that the vehicle’s use is reasonable and would not pose a public safety risk.

Sideguards Save Lives

Underride crashes are collisions involving cars and large trucks where the car slides under the body of the truck during the collision. Due to the point of impact for such collisions often being the hood or windshield of the car, such crashes are especially deadly.

Side underride guards, or sideguards, are structures attached to the bottom of the sides of trailers in order to lower the profile of a trailer to more closely align with passenger vehicle profiles. Side underride guards prevent vehicles, in the event of a collision with a truck’s body or trailer, from sliding under the body or trailer.

Previous efforts to require sideguards have been stymied by the trucking lobby. ProPublica and Frontline have extensively reported on how pressure from the American Trucking Association repeatedly led to NHTSA significantly watering down and rewriting reports – including the removal of a recommendation to federally mandate side guards.

SB 961 requires every truck with a gross vehicle weight rating exceeding 10,000 pounds manufactured, sold, or registered in the state to be equipped with functional side guards on both lateral sides of the vehicle. The bill requires the side guard to be able to provide crash protection for mid-size vehicles colliding with a trailer at up to 40 miles per hour.

SB 961 also directs the CHP to require inspection by the department of the side guards of any vehicle involved in a collision impacting the side guards, and require vehicle drivers to conduct regular inspections of side guards for damage and functionality and replace damaged units as necessary.

Making Streets Accessible to All

In transportation planning, “Complete Streets” is an approach to designing and operating roads and the surrounding infrastructure that accounts for all road users, including pedestrians, cyclists, motorists, and transit riders. It also accounts for the needs of communities that have been systematically ignored in the design of the built environment, including the disability community, the aging community, those without access to vehicles, and communities of color.

Complete Streets elements can include sidewalks, bike lanes, bus-only lanes, comfortable and accessible public transportation stops, frequent and safe crosswalks, median islands, accessible pedestrian signals, curb extensions, narrower travel lanes, and more.

In California, most surface roads maintained by the state do not have infrastructure to protect the full range of road users. Most (55%) projects in Caltrans’s biggest road maintenance program, the State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP) have no complete streets elements. Many state-owned roads currently have no or deficient sidewalks, minimal crosswalks, no bike lanes, or any safe facilities for vulnerable road users. The result is that state roads are inaccessible or dangerous to many potential users.

In 2019, the Legislature passed SB 127 (Wiener), which required Caltrans to prioritize safe and connected facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit riders on all SHOPP projects and in the asset management plan. Such improvements are consistent with recommendations outlined in the State’s Climate Action Plan for Transportation Infrastructure (CAPTI). Governor Newsom vetoed the bill but implemented many of its provisions in watered-down form through executive order.

SB 960 codifies the Department’s commitment to implement complete streets by requiring Caltrans to prioritize the implementation of safe, convenient, and connected facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit users on all SHOPP projects.

SB 960 requires Caltrans to set 4-year and 10-year targets and performance measures reflecting complete streets assets. SB 960 further requires the Department to establish a streamlined process for the approval of pedestrian facilities, traffic calming improvements, bicycle facilities, and transit priority treatments at locations where state-owned facilities intersect with local facilities.

Prioritizing Transit

Buses and some other modes of public transportation are often stuck in traffic, creating a slow, frustrating, and stressful experience for riders and making transit less attractive. Planners can improve this experience by designating certain roads to be transit priority roads, which could include adding features like a rapid bus lane.

Caltrans has engaged in preliminary stakeholder engagement to develop a transit priority policy. The timeline for development of this policy – or its specific objectives – is currently unclear. Amidst a backdrop of transit ridership struggling to rebound and car ownership costing more than it ever has, it is imperative that this process proceed swiftly.

SB 960 directs Caltrans to develop – by January 1, 2026 – a transit priority policy with performance targets to improve transit travel time reliability, speeds, reduced transit and rider delay, and improved accessibility at stops, stations, and boarding facilities.

Further, the bill requires Caltrans to establish automatic and expedited design exceptions and a streamlined approval process for transit priority improvements.

Senate Bill 960 is sponsored by Calbike, SPUR, Streets For All, AARP California, TransForm, KidSafe SF, and Walk SF.

Senate Bill 961 is sponsored by CalBike, Streets For All, and Walk SF.

“Traffic crashes are the leading cause of death for kids in California in large part because vehicles are now faster and more dangerous than ever. We’ve all seen situations on our streets where a vehicle is speeding down a busy street with vulnerable people close by — at best it’s unsettling, and at worst people lose their lives,” said Robin Pam, an organizer with KidSafe SF.

“This legislation is an important step toward making our streets–and cities–safer for everyone by preventing vehicles from speeding dangerously on our city streets and redesigning our roads for safety. We applaud Senator Wiener’s leadership at the state level to to make our streets safe enough for kids.”


“Complete Streets not only make it easier for people to choose biking or walking, enabling the mode shift we need to combat climate change, but they make our streets safer for people in all modes of transportation. Truck side guards and speed governors are two simple, effective, and achievable ways to save lives on our dangerous streets,” says CalBike Policy Director Jared Sanchez. “CalBike is proud to be a cosponsor of Senator Wiener’s excellent safe streets package of bills.”

https://www.calbike.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Senator-Scott-Wiener-Press-Conference-scaled.jpeg 1707 2560 CalBike Staff https://www.calbike.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/calbike-logo.png CalBike Staff2024-01-24 15:57:002024-01-24 15:57:02CalBike Sponsors Senator Wiener’s Safe Streets Bills

2024 California Bicycle Summit to Be Held by the San Diego Bay

January 23, 2024/by Kevin Claxton

We are delighted to announce the venue for the 2024 California Bicycle Summit, to be held in San Diego on April 18-19, 2024. Meetings will be held at the Wyndham San Diego Bayside, located at 1355 North Harbor Drive.

Located between Little Italy and San Diego’s historic and very walkable Gaslamp District, the Wyndham is near the waterfront and a ferry to Coronado. Explore San Diego by the convenient nearby transit or rent a bike at Wheel Fun Rentals next to the hotel. Other nearby amenities include an electric car charging station and a variety of restaurants and pubs.

How to get there

The Wyndham is easily accessible by local bus or trolley. If you travel to San Diego on Amtrak, the train station where the Pacific Surfliner drops you off is less than half a mile away. The hotel has a complimentary shuttle from the airport that runs every half hour.

If you drive, you can pay for parking in the hotel garage, whether or not you’re a hotel guest. And, for those who arrive by bike, we will provide valet bike parking at the Wyndham.

Where to stay

You can book a room at the Wyndham with a conference discount. After you register, you’ll receive information on how to book at the conference rate. There are also several other hotels within easy walking distance of the venue. 

To make the Summit as accessible as possible, we will also have a limited number of spaces available to stay with local CalBike members. If you’d like to request a homestay, fill out this application. If you can host an attendee, please fill out a homestay host form.

What to do at the Summit

We’re working on an exciting program, with sessions covering a diverse range of topics, including state legislation, local action, innovative funding sources for active transportation projects, and much more. Planners, agency representatives, advocates, and thought leaders on active transportation will present ideas from across California and beyond. Look for more information on the sessions soon.

While you’re at the California Bicycle Summit, you can also experience the city’s amenities on several biking and walking tours. And there are numerous restaurants nearby, including three in the hotel and many different cuisines in the surrounding neighborhoods, plus lots of other fun activities in sunny San Diego.

We hope you can join us in April for California’s premiere active transportation advocacy conference. Save your spot today.

https://www.calbike.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/wyndham-sandiego-homepage-home-slide-3-5ec7f55b75bf4-615x430-1.jpeg 430 615 Kevin Claxton https://www.calbike.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/calbike-logo.png Kevin Claxton2024-01-23 11:12:272024-02-01 16:55:502024 California Bicycle Summit to Be Held by the San Diego Bay

Climate Ride 2024: Countdown to a Century 

January 19, 2024/by Andrew Wright

I’ve never been much for New Year’s resolutions. In high school, I would say I was going to keep my binders organized, only to find them a familiar mess by Valentine’s Day. To help me get on track this year, I have registered for the 2024 NorCal Green Fondo and will be sharing my training. If you want to join me in supporting CalBike on this year’s Green Fondos, you can find full details and register on the Climate Ride website.

Where I have succeeded is in setting a date, finding an event, and building a process to get me where I need to be in time for the event. In 2013, I ran my first half marathon in Louisville, Kentucky, and much to my surprise, I surpassed my target speed by almost 20 minutes. For the next seven years, I put half marathons on my calendar to structure my workouts, stringing together long streaks of runs and easily covering 150 miles a month. 

When Covid came around, I was slowed down a bit, and then the arrival of my first daughter in October 2020 ground my training to a halt. By the time my second daughter was born in August 2022, my body, schedule, and priorities were completely rearranged from that day in Louisville a decade ago. When I did run, the gap between my current pace and previous performance was dispiriting, and my newly developed plantar fasciitis also made running acutely painful. 

This is why I decided to book a spot in Climate Ride’s 2024 NorCal Green Fondo this May 17-19. I’ve been putting together long rides on the weekends in the Burbank hills and getting on my Peloton (follow my progress here) four days a week, all with the goal of riding a century or 100-mile ride as part of the Green Fondo in May. 

Individual Giving Manager Andrew Wright alongside his bike in the hills above Glendale.

Over the years, I have gone on a fair number of different overnight camping adventures on foot and in a kayak, but I was nervous about going out on a bicycle. While it sounds like fun, I want the expertise of an outfit like Climate Ride to assist me on my first bike adventure. Their years of experience and many positive reviews make me confident that Climate Ride will create a fun, safe, and supported route for me to reach this goal in 2024. 

The fact that 100% of my fundraising for the Fondo supports CalBike makes the event a win/win. 

Let me know if you’ll be taking part in the May Green Fondo. We’ll have a special CalBike meetup after the first day of riding!

https://www.calbike.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Andrew-Wright-bike-handles-scaled.jpg 1706 2560 Andrew Wright https://www.calbike.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/calbike-logo.png Andrew Wright2024-01-19 12:33:282024-01-19 14:37:39Climate Ride 2024: Countdown to a Century 

CalBike Announces People-First Mobility Budget

January 18, 2024/by Brian Smith

For Immediate Release: 1/18/24

Contact: Jared Sanchez, CalBike, (714) 262-0921, Jared@CalBike.org

CalBike Launches People-First Mobility Budget Campaign

SACRAMENTO – In California, our transportation sector contributes more than any other sector to climate pollution. The Climate Action Plan for Transportation Infrastructure (CAPTI) lays out a limited set of plans and goals for reducing emissions from transportation. However, it’s not enough. And climate change isn’t a problem we can push off into a hazy future; it’s here now. 

We need to spend more, not less, on active transportation, and although California will need to make some hard choices due to the budget shortfall this year, there is no deficit in the transportation budget.

“California is falling behind and we need to put our money where our climate policies are,” says Jared Sanchez, policy director for CalBike. “CalBike’s People-First Mobility Budget prioritizes projects that mitigate climate change, increase equity, and expand transportation choices. If we build safe, connected, Complete Streets networks, Californians can choose their transportation mode instead of being forced into a car.”

To address this lack of choice, today CalBike has launched a new campaign: the People-First Mobility Budget.

The People-First Mobility Budget for 2024-2025 

The People-First Mobility Budget, which includes $20 billion in state funding and  $9 billion from federal transportation funding, proposes distributing those funds as follows: 

  • 50% of the State Highway Account (SHA) to active transportation projects, and other VMT-reducing projects. 
  • $700 million to the Active Transportation Program (ATP). 
  • A $2 billion set aside for the construction of truly Complete Streets. 
  • 25% of the Federal Trust Fund to VMT-reducing projects, including but not limited to implementing transit priority corridors on state/federal highways. 
  • 75% of combined federal and state monies would continue to prioritize the repair and maintenance of state-controlled roads. This fix-it-first allocation of approximately $15 billion will pay for needed repairs such as fixing potholes, hardening infrastructure against extreme weather, and scheduled repaving. No repair projects should include new lanes, interchanges, or other infrastructure that would increase vehicle miles traveled (VMT). 
  • At least half of the above spending should go toward improving infrastructure in historically underserved areas. 
  • Zero funding for increased highway capacity. No new freeway lanes, overpasses, or interchanges.

Benefits of a people-first approach to mobility

A people-centered approach to transportation priorities doesn’t force anyone out of their car, but it gives Californians choices about how they get around their communities. Here are just a few of the benefits.

  • Greater independence for youth and seniors
  • Healthier neighborhoods. 
  • Financial savings. AAA calculates the average annual cost of car ownership at $9,282. For someone making $50,000 a year, that’s 20% of their income going to transportation. Taking public transit is cheaper. And walking is free.
  • Improved physical and mental health. Commuting or running errands by bike is a great way to incorporate physical movement into a daily routine. And regular exercise improves mental health as well.
  • Less congestion. Two of the top 10 most congested cities in the US are in California: Los Angeles and San Francisco. According to US News and World Report, that congestion comes with a financial cost of around $1,600 per driver each year, not to mention lost time and frustration.

###

https://www.calbike.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/bus-bike-and-car-lanes.jpg 800 1600 Brian Smith https://www.calbike.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/calbike-logo.png Brian Smith2024-01-18 12:08:002024-01-19 16:13:10CalBike Announces People-First Mobility Budget

2024 People-First Mobility Budget for California

January 17, 2024/by Jared Sanchez
Read more
https://www.calbike.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/thumb-scaled.jpg 1703 2560 Jared Sanchez https://www.calbike.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/calbike-logo.png Jared Sanchez2024-01-17 17:34:412024-07-30 10:02:002024 People-First Mobility Budget for California

Jeanie Ward-Waller Joins CalBike as Consultant

January 16, 2024/by Kendra Ramsey

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

January 12, 2024

Leading Transportation Expert and Advocate Jeanie Ward-Waller Joins Fearless Advocacy

Contacts:        

Jeanie Ward-Waller (jeanie@fearlessadvocacy.com) 

Jennifer Fearing (jennifer@fearlessadvocacy.com) 

Kendra Ramsey (kendra@calbike.org)

SACRAMENTO – Fearless Advocacy, a Sacramento-based consulting firm specializing in advancing the policy agendas of mission-based and cause-oriented organizations, is pleased to announce that Jeanie Ward-Waller starts today as the firm’s first Director of Transportation Advocacy. Ward-Waller comes to Fearless Advocacy with nearly two decades of experience as a licensed professional engineer, advocate, and government executive. A former deputy director for planning and modal programs at Caltrans, Jeanie has been a vocal leader in advancing equitable and sustainable transportation in California from both inside and outside of government. 

“It’s a time of critical change in transportation, and bold leadership is needed to tackle the challenge of reimagining our car-dependent system. I couldn’t be more excited to join the highly influential Fearless Advocacy team and strengthen transportation advocacy in support of clients committed to this mission. I’m particularly honored to launch this work in partnership with CalBike, TransForm, and ClimatePlan, organizations that I know well and deeply respect, and invite anyone interested in collaborating to reach out,” said Ward-Waller.

In her new role, Jeanie today launches a lobbying and consulting practice focused on advancing transportation public policy and investment objectives aligned with California’s ambitious goals to rapidly improve sustainable travel options and reduce the harmful impacts from driving on our most vulnerable communities and the global climate. Jeanie’s expertise is expected to bring elevated value to Fearless Advocacy’s existing work to accelerate state support and development of wildlife crossings and corridors. 

“It’s thrilling to take this next step with Jeanie to build Fearless Advocacy’s capacity and scope. Her experience, values, and fearlessness are unparalleled in California’s transportation policy realm and she will bring immediate and immense value to her clients,” said Jennifer Fearing, founder and president of Fearless Advocacy. “I look forward to the synergies we will generate, and the good we will do together for people and the planet.” 

“We’re beyond excited to have Jeanie working with CalBike again,” says Kendra Ramsey, CalBike executive director. “Her skills as a mobility advocate and her deep understanding of Caltrans from the inside will be invaluable assets in our campaign to make state-controlled roadways safer for people biking, walking, and taking transit.”

“I’m thrilled that Jeanie will be working with TransForm to hold state agencies accountable on how they spend transportation dollars. I’ve seen Jeanie in action, and she’s the strategic coalition builder we need to make real change happen so that we can meet California’s climate and equity goals.” – Jenn Guitart, Executive Director of TransForm.

Fearless Advocacy is in its tenth year producing policy and budget successes for nonprofits in California. Fearing has been named to the Capitol Weekly’s annual “Top 100” list five times and in 2019 was voted by her peers as public interest lobbyist of the year. She authored the chapter on nonprofit lobbying in the Kendall-Hunt textbook A Practitioner’s Guide to Lobbying and Advocacy in California.

##

https://www.calbike.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Jeanie-Ward-Waller.jpeg 450 450 Kendra Ramsey https://www.calbike.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/calbike-logo.png Kendra Ramsey2024-01-16 16:17:102024-01-16 16:17:10Jeanie Ward-Waller Joins CalBike as Consultant

There Is No Deficit in California’s Transportation Budget

January 10, 2024/by Jared Sanchez

As California begins negotiations for its 2024-2025 budget, much of the talk will center on a projected $38 billion shortfall. In past years, Governor Gavin Newsom has used budget deficits as reasons to veto active transportation bills. In 2023, the governor initially took back half of the extra $1.05 billion allocated to the Active Transportation Program (ATP) in a surplus year, though that money was later returned. And, to be clear, the “extra” funding still wasn’t enough to greenlight all the worthy projects in the chronically underfunded and urgently needed program.

The governor’s proposed 2024-2025 budget once again takes money from the ATP while leaving freeway spending untouched.

We need to spend more, not less, on active transportation and, although California will need to make some hard choices due to the budget shortfall this year, there is no deficit in the transportation budget. There is more money in the transportation coffers than there has ever been.

State revenue for transportation has soared with the passage of SB 1 in 2017. SB 1 expanded funding for California’s transportation system by an average of $5.4 billion annually. Now, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA), passed in 2021, is sending federal cash to California. The IIJA will bring California an estimated $41.9 billion over five years from Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) 2022 through FFY 2026. If you compare the 2017-2018 transportation budget with that of 2023-2024, the additional money available for transportation infrastructure is clear:

  • $13 billion in state funds (2017-18)
  • $21 billion in state funds (2023-24)
  • $6 billion in federal funds (2017-18)
  • $12 billion in federal funds (2023-24)

Totals: 

  • $19 billion in state & federal funds (2017-18)
  • $33 billion in state & federal funds (2023-24)

State Transportation Budget Demystified

Given how transportation funds are raised, the transportation budget is self-generating (user taxes and fees) and generally immune from the stark deficits found in the whole of California’s budget, which is significantly dependent on income taxes and facing a $68 billion deficit this coming year. 

The entire state budget from last year was almost $300 billion. The transportation budget represented 7% of that: $21 billion. 

Caltrans funding chart

Chart from TRANSPORTATION FUNDING IN CALIFORNIA 2023.

The governor and legislature dictate how state revenues are spent on the transportation network. The legislature appropriates state funding for specific purposes each year. Below are the main programs according to the 2023-24 budget year.

Dwindling gas taxes shouldn’t mean active transportation spending dries up

In December 2023, the California Legislative Analyst Office (LAO) issued a report on the future of transportation funding as more people move to electric vehicles and state gas tax revenues decline. This could pose a threat to the ATP, which receives most of its funding from gasoline taxes. But it shouldn’t.

The LAO report estimated that California’s funding from gas taxes will drop by over $4 billion in the next decade due to the state’s switch from gas- to electric-powered vehicles, about a third of that amount.

Six years after the passage of Senate Bill 1, the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017, California needs to draft a new mega-transportation bill. Rather than using the decline in gas purchases as an excuse to cut funding for the active transportation infrastructure we urgently need to complete the transition from fossil fuels, California must find sustainable funding sources to drive our transportation system. 

State leaders were aware of this problem when SB 1 was being negotiated in 2016-2017, so they included a new tax on zero-emission vehicle owners called the “Road Improvement Fee.” The fee charges electric vehicle owners an annual flat $100 that is adjusted for inflation. The adjusted rate for the calendar year 2023 is $108. This fee only applies to electric vehicles with the model year 2020 or later. 

The road improvement fee helps to offset the decline in gas tax revenue, but, as the LAO report suggests, California will have to find new funding sources or reduce its transportation spending. The solution may be to do some of both. 

California can build an excellent transportation system that serves the needs of residents. The LAO report’s focus on highway maintenance and rehabilitation programs ignores the billions that go to capacity expansion for motor vehicles. Eliminating the short- and long-term costs of expanding freeway capacity, including canceling projects currently in the pipeline that have not begun construction, would immediately free up millions of dollars for Complete Streets, public transportation, and even deficit reduction. At the same time, this shift will help California get on track with its GHG reduction goals — goals impossible to meet if we keep building new freeway capacity.

Revenue decline will be slower than predicted

LAO bases its analysis on ARB’s Scoping Plan. As a recent NRDC analysis showed, the state is not even close to reaching the ambitious goals laid out in that plan. To use it as the foundation for analysis is inaccurate as it does not reflect the current policy reality. For example, the scoping plan sets VMT reduction goals that California isn’t meeting. In fact, the reverse is happening: VMT has soared in recent years, filling transportation coffers with gas tax revenue. 

ZEV sales have increased from 4% of all new vehicle sales in 2017 to 25% in 2023. However promising sales of new ZEVs are in California, ZEVs still only make up about 3% of all light-duty cars on the road. Dirty heavy-duty trucks, buses, and vans are hardly transitioning to electric. While this is bad news for the environment, it leaves diesel tax revenue mostly steady for years to come. In reality, the decline in gas and diesel use will be much slower than the LAO posits.

A People-First Mobility Budget

In the coming days, CalBike will propose a People-First Mobility Budget that realigns California’s transportation spending to projects that provide more mobility options, healthier neighborhoods, more equitable transportation, and fewer harmful tailpipe emissions.

California can and should change its road-building priorities from expensive, climate-killing freeways and wide local thruways for cars and trucks. Complete Streets that accommodate all modes of transportation are cheaper to build, more economical to operate, and improve health and mobility for our state’s residents. We need a transportation budget plan that supports sustainable modes and a vision for the future. Our budget proposal will do just that.

https://www.calbike.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/cash-money-budget-scaled.jpg 1707 2560 Jared Sanchez https://www.calbike.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/calbike-logo.png Jared Sanchez2024-01-10 16:29:562024-01-10 16:29:57There Is No Deficit in California’s Transportation Budget

CalBike Response to Governor’s 2024 Budget

January 10, 2024/by Brian Smith

For Immediate Release: 1/10/24

Contact: Jared Sanchez, Policy Director, CalBike, (714) 262-0921, Jared@CalBike.org

Governor’s Budget Steals from California’s Future

SACRAMENTO – The California Bicycle Coalition (CalBike) released the following response to Governor Gavin Newsom’s proposed budget, which fills a $200 million shortfall in the transportation budget by cutting $200 million from the Active Transportation Program (ATP).

Statement from Jared Sanchez, CalBike Policy Director:

“For the second year in a row, Governor Newsom is proposing to strip funding from one of the most cost-effective transportation programs in California. The ATP needs more money, not less, to fund dozens of worthwhile, shovel-ready projects that don’t make the cut each cycle because of inadequate funding. This is absolutely the wrong place to make cuts. 

“The governor should pull funding from the State Highway Account to cover shortfalls rather than stretching climate funding from the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (GGRF) even thinner. We need to stop spending on freeway expansion and double down on climate mitigation projects, like those funded by the ATP.”

From the Governor’s Budget Summary:

There is a $200 million hole in the transportation budget:

“The Budget proposes adjustments to transportation infrastructure to account for a reduction in forecasted General Fund revenue. The Budget includes a reduction of $1.1 billion General Fund, partially offset by $791 million of Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, for a net reduction of $200 million.” (Source: Governor’s Budget Summary, p. 109)

The proposed budget fills this shortfall by taking $200 million from the ATP: 

“Active Transportation—A reduction of $200 million to the Active Transportation Program (ATP). This will leave the Active Transportation Program with $850 million in one-time funding. To ensure no impact to previously-awarded projects, the $200 million reduction will be backfilled from ATP funding that was anticipated to be available for allocation in future cycles.” (ibid, p. 35)

###

https://www.calbike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/iStock-598565062_purchased-scaled.jpg 1707 2560 Brian Smith https://www.calbike.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/calbike-logo.png Brian Smith2024-01-10 15:36:212024-01-10 15:36:23CalBike Response to Governor’s 2024 Budget

Stop Fueling Climate Change: Coalition Challenges Governor to Shift Transportation Spending

January 9, 2024/by Jared Sanchez

A week before Christmas, CalBike worked with a coalition of 25 transportation and environmental organizations to issue a call to action for California to align its transportation spending with its climate goals. The coalition sent a letter to Governor Gavin Newsom and our state transportation leaders, asking them to shift spending from projects that increase climate-altering emissions to those that mitigate climate change.

Critically, the letter doesn’t ask for any new funds. In a year with a large projected budget deficit, new spending programs would be a tough sell in Sacramento. However, as the letter details, the transportation budget has multiple dedicated funding sources and, thanks to the federal Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA), will have more cash in 2024. 

Even without new revenue sources, it’s essential that California change where it spends transportation dollars. With a significant allocation of funding, we could build appealing, connected bikeways, transit infrastructure, and walkable neighborhoods that incentivize active and shared transportation. The build-it-and-they-will-come approach has worked in numerous European cities, and it can work in California, particularly because our wide roadways have the capacity to safely accommodate multiple transportation modes.

The letter provides a list of ambitious requests for the transportation portion of the governor’s budget.

  1. Consider any proposed reductions in General Fund spending on transportation infrastructure in the context of our climate and equity goals, and honor prior transit, clean transportation funding, and critical maintenance commitments, including but not limited to TIRCP ($2 billion/year), ATP ($500 million/year), and ZETCP ($1.1 million over four years).
  2. Backfill any General Fund cuts by leveraging the existing statutory flexibility of federal highway formula funds as well as funding from the State Highway Account. To maximize this flexibility, California can move up to 50% of National Highway Performance Program funding (nearly $1.25 billion) into the Surface Transportation Block Grant Program, which would make these funds eligible for a significantly wider array of investments, including investments in complete streets (including active transportation infrastructure and certain types of transit priority infrastructure), transit capital projects, climate resilience projects, workforce development programs, and more.
  3. Suspend California state investment in new highway capacity (with the potential to rescope or reimagine impacted projects to preserve investment levels and ensure community benefits) as an imprudent use of funds that the state cannot afford, given the realities of the state budget. Last year, the state spent several billion on expansion projects on state highways and local streets and roads. These allocations should be eliminated for this fiscal year to ensure fiscal responsibility and ensure we are not expanding our future pool of maintenance responsibility. Moreover, the effects of such projects further contributing to climate change, environmental injustice, and cumulative pollution burdens on communities will need to be remediated for an untold future cost.
  4. Develop a multi-year funding commitment that ensures at least 50% of the State Highway Account (SHA) funds go to VMT-reducing projects while prioritizing investments in California’s most burdened communities. This can include diverting funding away from traffic enforcement to invest in traffic calming and public transportation infrastructure, as that is a safer and more effective approach to achieving our transportation goals.
12:19:23 Transportation Budget RequestDownload
https://www.calbike.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/one-planet-investdivest-scaled.jpg 1707 2560 Jared Sanchez https://www.calbike.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/calbike-logo.png Jared Sanchez2024-01-09 11:01:242024-01-10 16:29:33Stop Fueling Climate Change: Coalition Challenges Governor to Shift Transportation Spending

Latest News

  • California State Capitol
    California’s Transportation Spending Has the Wrong PrioritiesMay 14, 2025 - 2:26 pm
  • CalBike Webinar: Improving our Communities with Slow StreetsMay 13, 2025 - 12:12 pm
  • e-bike
    E-Bike Purchase Incentives FAQsMay 9, 2025 - 3:12 pm
Follow a manual added link

Get Email Updates

Follow a manual added link

Join Calbike

  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to X
  • Link to LinkedIn
  • Link to Mail
  • Link to Instagram

About Us

Board
Careers
Contact Us
Financials & Governance
Local Partners
Privacy Policy
Staff
State & National Allies
Volunteer

Advocacy

California Bicycle Summit
E-Bike
Legislative Watch
Past and Present Projects
Report: Incomplete Streets
Sign On Letters

Resources

Maps & Routes
Crash Help and Legal Resources
Quick-Build Bikeway Design Guide
Report: Complete Streets
All Resources

Support

Ways to give
Become a Member
Donor Advised Funds
Donate a Car
Business Member

News

Blog
CalBike in the News
Press Releases

© California Bicycle Coalition 2025

1017 L Street #288
Sacramento, CA 95814
© California Bicycle Coalition 2025

Scroll to top