CalBike
  • About
  • Advocacy
    • 2025 Legislative Watch
    • Restore $400M to the ATP
    • Support the Quick-Build Pilot
    • Keep Bike Highways Moving
    • Sign-On Letters
    • 2025 Bike Month
  • Resources
    • News
    • Report: Incomplete Streets
    • Bicycle Summit Virtual Sessions
    • California Bicycle Laws
    • E-Bike Resources
    • Map & Routes
    • Quick-Build Bikeway Design Guide
  • Support
    • Become a Member
    • Business Member
    • Shop
  • Bike Month
  • Search
  • Menu Menu
  • About
  • Advocacy
    • Legislative Watch
    • Invest/Divest
    • Sign-On Letters
    • Report: Incomplete Streets
    • Bike the Vote
  • Resources
    • News
    • California Bicycle Laws
    • E-Bike Resources
    • Map & Routes
    • Quick-Build Bikeway Design Guide
  • Support
    • Become a CalBike Member
    • Business Member
    • Shop

Yes on Prop 10

September 24, 2018/by Zac

CalBike Statement in Support of Proposition 10

Our transportation and housing policies are closely intertwined; we cannot change one without the other.

Affordable housing is absolutely essential to create and maintain equitable, inclusive, and prosperous communities. At CalBike, we advocate exactly for that, primarily by changing state transportation policy to enable residents to avail themselves of the healthful, joyful, and extremely affordable choice of bicycling for transportation. But we don’t advocate for bicycling in isolation.

Transportation costs are second only to housing costs when considering top household expenses. In virtually every real estate market, a major determinant of housing costs is accessibility. If your rent is low, but you have to spend a disproportionately large share of your income on transportation, then your living situation isn’t affordable. Without truly affordable housing accessible in every community, we will fall flat in our efforts to enable all of California’s communities to be equitable, inclusive, prosperous, and full of bicycles.

Housing affordability has reached a crisis point in California. The state has the highest poverty rate in the country due, in part, to the high cost of housing, with one-third of renter households paying over 50% of their income on rent. A leading reason for rising costs is the failure to protect low-income and marginalized residents from displacement when neighborhoods gentrify. There is strong evidence that transportation infrastructure improvements, including bike lanes, contribute to and exacerbate displacement of low-income residents of color. As we advocate for safer and more accessible transportation infrastructure, we need to help ensure that existing, current, and future residents, of all means, are able to utilize infrastructure improvements instead of being pushed out as improvements come. Protecting the most marginalized residents in California’s communities, through protecting and creating affordable housing for lower-income Californians, is a part of determining who infrastructure improvements truly serve.

Unfortunately, a 1995 state law severely limits the authority of local governments to control rents and protect affordable rental housing. Without changes to state law, new bike lanes and other public investment in communities too often means displacement of existing residents, usually low-income people of color. That might make a place more prosperous, but not more equitable and inclusive, and that’s contrary to our mission. Our mission is to advocate for equitable community transformations that benefit and include everyone, especially the low-income communities and communities of color who live in high transit areas which are most likely to receive walking and biking infrastructure, and are therefore at risk for displacement of existing residents and the loss of cultural resources that already exist in these neighborhoods. Our transportation justice goals work to ensure that our state utilizes smart growth and urban revitalization as tools to actively address the negative human and environmental impacts of the affordable housing crisis in California, and never to mask, ignore, or deepen current inequities.

https://www.calbike.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/prop10.png 628 1200 Zac https://www.calbike.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/calbike-logo.png Zac2018-09-24 12:51:372019-03-27 09:24:36Yes on Prop 10

Comprehensive Multimodal Corridor Plan Draft Guidelines

September 19, 2018/by Zac

Our work in helping to ensure the development and implementation of the critical transportation funding package continues with the release of the draft guidelines for the new Comprehensive Multimodal Corridor Plan; read our coalition’s comment letter about the work still to be done, and follow along with us here and on social media to stay in the loop as the new programs are rolled out.

CalBike and our coalition partners Climate Resolve, Climate Plan, TransForm, and the Coalition for Clean Air Comments On The 2018 Comprehensive Multimodal Corridor Plan Guidelines

https://www.calbike.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Comprehensive_Multimodal_Corridor_Plan_Draft_Guidelines.png 628 1200 Zac https://www.calbike.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/calbike-logo.png Zac2018-09-19 12:51:342018-11-17 12:57:29Comprehensive Multimodal Corridor Plan Draft Guidelines

New Definitions Have Grave Implications For California’s Active Transportation Program

September 4, 2018/by Zac

Californians have agreed to set aside funding for what the state terms “Disadvantaged Communities”, to support projects aimed at “improving public health, quality of life and economic opportunity in California’s most burdened communities at the same time reducing pollution that causes climate change.”

If we’ve prioritized these funds for our most vulnerable and negatively impacted neighbors, aren’t the definitions of what makes a community “disadvantaged” and decisions about where this funding should be prioritized critically important? Read our coalition’s Recommendations for Regional Disadvantaged Communities Definitions in the Active Transportation Program to learn more about how we can all work with our transportation system, its regulators, and the communities it most affects to ensure we meet our statewide goals.

https://www.calbike.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/monthly_hackathon.png 628 1200 Zac https://www.calbike.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/calbike-logo.png Zac2018-09-04 22:01:022018-11-14 17:03:56New Definitions Have Grave Implications For California’s Active Transportation Program

Latest News

  • California State Capitol
    California’s Transportation Spending Has the Wrong PrioritiesMay 14, 2025 - 2:26 pm
  • CalBike Webinar: Improving our Communities with Slow StreetsMay 13, 2025 - 12:12 pm
  • e-bike
    E-Bike Purchase Incentives FAQsMay 9, 2025 - 3:12 pm
Follow a manual added link

Get Email Updates

Follow a manual added link

Join Calbike

  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to X
  • Link to LinkedIn
  • Link to Mail
  • Link to Instagram
About Us

Board
Careers
Contact Us
Financials & Governance
Local Partners
Privacy Policy
Staff
State & National Allies
Volunteer

Advocacy

California Bicycle Summit
E-Bike
Legislative Watch
Past and Present Projects
Report: Incomplete Streets
Sign On Letters

Resources

Maps & Routes
Crash Help and Legal Resources
Quick-Build Bikeway Design Guide
Report: Complete Streets
All Resources

Support

Ways to give
Become a Member
Donor Advised Funds
Donate a Car
Business Member

News

Blog
CalBike in the News
Press Releases

© California Bicycle Coalition 2025

1017 L Street #288
Sacramento, CA 95814
© California Bicycle Coalition 2025

Scroll to top