CalBike
  • About
  • Advocacy
    • 2025 Legislative Watch
    • Keep Bike Highways Moving
    • Support the Quick-Build Pilot
    • Sign-On Letters
  • Resources
    • News
    • Report: Incomplete Streets
    • Bicycle Summit Virtual Sessions
    • California Bicycle Laws
    • E-Bike Resources
    • Map & Routes
    • Quick-Build Bikeway Design Guide
  • Support
    • Become a Member
    • Business Member
    • Shop
  • Search
  • Menu Menu
  • About
  • Advocacy
    • Legislative Watch
    • Invest/Divest
    • Sign-On Letters
    • Report: Incomplete Streets
    • Bike the Vote
  • Resources
    • News
    • California Bicycle Laws
    • E-Bike Resources
    • Map & Routes
    • Quick-Build Bikeway Design Guide
  • Support
    • Become a CalBike Member
    • Business Member
    • Shop

The California Bicycle Coalition Seeks to Demystify Building Protected Bike Lanes for Californian Cities

August 26, 2016/by CalBike Staff

In 2016, CalBike rolled out a campaign to demystify and promote a type of bike lane that was, at the time, still relatively new to the United States but rapidly gaining favor across the country: the protected bike lane, officially called a “Separated Bikeway.” Cities around California and across the world are building these new, safer bike lanes that protect bicycle traffic from car traffic with physical barriers such as planter boxes or parked cars.

These “Separated Bikeways” have been standard procedure in European countries for decades but are still rare here. While California actually leads in the number of protected bike lanes built (tracked in reporting by People for Bikes), the state is far from having enough of these protected bikeways as networked systems. The California Bicycle Coalition wants to rectify that by making it clear that this infrastructure is not only vetted and approved by Caltrans, but is also compliant with both CA HDM (CA Highway Design Manual) and MUTCD (Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices).

“Protected bike lanes are a key reason why it’s so safe, comfortable and convenient to ride a bike in cities like Amsterdam and Copenhagen,” said Dave Snyder, the Executive Director of CalBike. “We can have that here too, but first we need to build them.”

The following California cities from North to South had already built separated bikeways by 2016: Davis, Emeryville, Oakland, San Francisco, Alameda, Modesto, Palo Alto, San Jose, Santa Cruz, Carpenteria, Oxnard, Temple City, Santa Monica, Los Angeles, Redondo Beach, Long Beach, San Jacinto, Murrieta, and Carlsbad. Since then, many more cities have adopted this safe infrastructure.

To call attention to the tremendous opportunity to create safer streets for everyone across the Golden State, CalBike contacted elected officials and Public Works Directors in the 50 largest cities across the state and distributed a concise 4-page brochure developed in collaboration with Alta Planning & Design.

CalBike_Class_IV_Bikeways_Brochure_Final_-_WebDownload

The brochure demystifies the process of creating a protected bike lane, showing that Caltrans has approved the design and that it can be inexpensive to build. Any city can build them. Santa Ana partnered with youth at a local KidWorks nonprofit to successfully apply for grant funding for their first separated lane in an area where it’s very dangerous for kids to bike to school. The city was so inspired it went on to successfully apply for further separated bikeway funding.

“In our work planning, designing, and implementing Separated Bikeways across the country, we have seen the many positive benefits including economic, health, and safety firsthand,” said Bryan Jones, Principal of Alta Planning + Design, who helped develop the brochure. “Implementation of separated bikeways in cities throughout California will be key to the success of achieving Caltrans’ vision of tripling ridership on bicycles.”

https://www.calbike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/protected-bikeways-act.jpg 684 1024 CalBike Staff https://www.calbike.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/calbike-logo.png CalBike Staff2016-08-26 14:37:142025-01-13 19:16:47The California Bicycle Coalition Seeks to Demystify Building Protected Bike Lanes for Californian Cities

CalBike Request Wins Reversal of CHP Bike-Blaming

August 12, 2016/by Zac

Early one morning last month, in a suburb of Sacramento, a motorist ran into the back of two bicyclists, killing one and injuring the other. It happened on Fiddyment Road in Roseville, a two-lane road with no shoulders and lanes so narrow that there’s no way a car could possibly pass a bicycle without crossing into opposing traffic.

That’s all we truly know: it’s an unexplained rear-end collision. The California Highway Patrol’s official statement, however, placed the blame squarely on the victim’s shoulders by repeating the driver’s claim that the bicyclist swerved into his path.

It’s bad news that police at the scene of a fatal car-bike crash too often take as fact the story of the only surviving witness, recording unsubstantiated claims in the official record. Important decisions about safety priorities are made based on these accounts. It’s worse when the CHP press office joins in blaming the person on the bicycle, interfering with a fair investigation. The victim blaming has been repeated far and wide in local media reports on the collision.

The California Bicycle Coalition contacted the California Highway Patrol after this happened and got a strong, concerned response from the CHP’s representative to the Bicycle Advisory Committee, Sergeant Scott Taylor. Taylor agreed that the CHP press releases should refrain from making conclusions about what happened in a potential crime until after the investigation is complete. Officer Taylor’s training will make a tragic incident such as this into a teachable moment by communicating helpful information to motorists to help prevent tragedies like this in the future.  Additionally, communication training will be provided at upcoming bicycle safety classes for the CHP public information officers.

https://www.calbike.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/calbike-logo.png 0 0 Zac https://www.calbike.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/calbike-logo.png Zac2016-08-12 18:34:372018-08-11 21:26:35CalBike Request Wins Reversal of CHP Bike-Blaming

Local Focus: Janine Rood of Chico Velo

August 12, 2016/by Zac

Janine Rood is the Executive Director of the California Bicycle Coalition’s affiliate in Chico, the Chico Velo Cycling Club. Our Media Director Melissa Balmer connected with Janine as part of our new series of interviews with our affiliates and other grassroots organizations across the state.

CalBike: What’s your first childhood memory of riding a bike?

Janine Rood: Ha! My folks got me a little bike when I was 5, but my dad didn’t believe in training wheels so I crashed once or twice, setting a precedent I’ve continued to live up/down to! I didn’t try to ride the bike again until my friend convinced me to try again about two years later. I got on the bike and flew. From then I’ve never looked back!

CalBike: Chico Velo Cycling Club is a bit of a misnomer for what your organization is really about. Will you share a little of your history and what kind of advocacy work you’re focusing on today?

JR: Chico Velo started out as more of a traditional bike club, but in the 1980’s the group decided to become a non-profit and focus on bike education, awareness and advocacy. Today, our active programs include kids’ bike safety, mountain bike education, advocacy and trail development, and a bike valet service. We encourage bike commuting, as well as advocate with the city and county to improve local bike infrastructure.

CalBike: How are things now in your region as far as equity is concerned? Is it a top of mind awareness conversation?

JR: Here in Northern California, the equity question is just starting to percolate. These new discussions mostly revolve around income differences, disparities between neighborhoods and homeless/transient issues. Biking is central to this discussion, as we have a major bike theft issue, and bikes are primary transportation for many homeless and transient people.

CalBike: As a woman, what would you like to see bike advocacy do in California and across the U.S. to build the skills and presence of women both in the movement and as riders?

JR: I want to teach women to love the freedom, power, and other benefits of cycling, to become fearless riders and capable at basic bike maintenance, competent to teach their kids, and to become advocates for better bike infrastructure on the routes they use.

CalBike: For the first time, I believe, Chico Velo Cycling Club will be partners on Active Transportation Projects. Can you share more about those projects and partnerships?

JR: Chico Velo is excited to have partnered with both the Cities of Paradise and Chico to provide the bike-related non-infrastructure component of their ATP project bids, specifically education, awareness and encouragement programs. The City of Paradise won two Safe Routes to Schools grants to improve neighborhood access and connectivity between schools for biking and walking. The City of Chico won funding for the next phase for the Highway 99 corridor bikeway.

CalBike: Your organization excels at events. Your Wildflower ride, coming up this spring, hosts over 4,000 riders annually. What advice do you have for advocate groups who want to be more successful at events?

JR: Events require a long view; don’t expect to make money the first year out of the gate (or even the first few). Treat every participant like gold, roll with the punches, and maybe most of all, find a way to select and design events that serve your other goals as much as the fundraising. That way if worse comes to worst, at least your event will move you forward on those other goals.

Learn more about Janine Rood and Chico Velo Cycling Club at chicovelo.org.

https://www.calbike.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/calbike-logo.png 0 0 Zac https://www.calbike.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/calbike-logo.png Zac2016-08-12 18:34:232018-08-11 21:26:15Local Focus: Janine Rood of Chico Velo

LACBC and MCM Team Up for Bike Share Equity

August 12, 2016/by Zac

Our local affiliate, the Los Angeles County Bicycle Coalition (LACBC) is teaming up with Multicultural Communities for Mobility (MCM) to help L.A. Metro ensure that their brand new bike share program is equitable, serving not just tourists and the well-off, but also low-income residents of Los Angeles. L.A. Metro Bike Share launched their pilot bike share program last month, with 65 docking stations in Downtown Los Angeles. LACBC and MCM will be looking carefully at the program, getting community input, and offering Metro some recommendations about how they can make the program more equitable. Metro Bike Share, says Rio J. Contreras, from MCM, who is taking the lead on the collaboration, is unique among bike share programs because it is the first in North America to be run by a Transportation Authority.

“We are able to start looking at bike share as a form of public transportation,” says Rio. Rio notes that, while some have criticized Metro for catering to the wealthy by placing a pilot program in Downtown L.A., there are thousands of service industry workers who take public transit to Downtown.

“If we can save them a 20 minute walk, replacing it with a 5-minute ride on a bike share bike,” says Rio, “then I think that’s a pretty amazing gain for our community members.”

Funded by the Better Bike Share partnership, this joint initiative will give MCM and LACBC a chance to do research on what low-income communities need in their transportation systems, creating a model for bringing community participation to future public transportation projects.

 

https://www.calbike.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/calbike-logo.png 0 0 Zac https://www.calbike.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/calbike-logo.png Zac2016-08-12 18:34:112018-08-11 21:25:53LACBC and MCM Team Up for Bike Share Equity

Making Protected Bike Lanes the New Normal

August 12, 2016/by Zac

This month, we’re taking an important step in our campaign to promote protected bike lanes among the state’s traffic engineers and policy makers. With the expert guidance of Alta Planning + Design, we developed a 4-page fact sheet to demonstrate how important protected bike lanes are, and how easy they are to build. The document, […]

Read more
https://www.calbike.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/calbike-logo.png 0 0 Zac https://www.calbike.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/calbike-logo.png Zac2016-08-12 18:33:582019-02-26 08:35:33Making Protected Bike Lanes the New Normal

Join Us! E-bike Demo on State Capitol Grounds Aug 18

August 12, 2016/by Zac

The best way to convince policymakers that bikes really can be practical and efficient transportation as well as a fun way to get around is to bring them out for a test ride. That’s especially true with e-bikes, as we discovered at our successful electric bike demo at the Air Resources Board back in June. So we planned another one at the Capitol in Sacramento for August 18.

This event helps to answer many questions we receive from policy makers, such as “What is an e-bike?” and “Can we really get people to ride a bike for transportation?” The August 18th demo will run from 11 a.m. to 2 p.m. on the Capitol Street traffic circle between 9th and 10th Streets on the west side of the Capitol building and right in front of the State Transportation Agency. If you’re in downtown Sacramento that day come test ride an e-bike!

Following the demo, we will be holding a reception and raffling off an e-bike at the Courtyard, 1522 14th Street, from 5 to 7 p.m. We would love to see you at both events!

https://www.calbike.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/calbike-logo.png 0 0 Zac https://www.calbike.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/calbike-logo.png Zac2016-08-12 18:33:442018-08-11 21:21:58Join Us! E-bike Demo on State Capitol Grounds Aug 18

We win more bike funding but how will the state spend it?

August 11, 2016/by Zac

Thanks to our allies throughout the state and a semi-supportive Governor, Californians can look forward to an increase in funding for bicycling infrastructure, but only as part of a reform package that represents a big change to active transportation spending in the state. CalBike supports that change — a radical consolidation of accounts — but only after the Governor’s administration does a better job of explaining how the reform will support bicycle safety.

The chart at the right shows how funding can increase to $134 million/year, from $100 million/year currently, because the federal TE program (Transportation Enhancements)  which in previous years was spent mostly for non-active transportation purposes is proposed to be spent entirely on active transportation. That good news is complicated though, because the increase comes with some conditions that threaten our movement for safer streets.

The bar on the right is all purple because the $134 million is split between the state (50{850a63fa8a72bae4d6bfa3f1eda9f619cddace10f9053ede128e2914f9ca5a15}), metropolitan regions (40{850a63fa8a72bae4d6bfa3f1eda9f619cddace10f9053ede128e2914f9ca5a15}) and rural areas (10{850a63fa8a72bae4d6bfa3f1eda9f619cddace10f9053ede128e2914f9ca5a15}). We are working to put conditions on the funding devolved to cities and counties and to control how state funding is allocated. The Governor’s proposal consolidates a number of programs into a single “Active Transportation Program.” Eliminated are the accounts listed on the chart: the federal Transportation Alternatives Program, the Environmental Enhancement and Mitigation Program, both the federal and state Safe Routes to School programs, and the Bicycle Transportation Account. But the Governor did not eliminate the funding for bicycle and pedestrian projects that supported those programs, and in fact transferred $21 million from the federal Highway Safety Improvement Program to ensure that California continued to spend the same amount of money on bicycling and walking despite a reduction in federal support for bicycling and walking. (Note: the EEMP program — mostly not for active transportation, is likely to be removed from the ATP, reducing the total to $124 million.)

The proposed elimination of these programs is unacceptable to us right now. Too many communities rely on “Safe Routes to School” grants and processes. Bicycle Transportation Account grants have spurred impressive planning efforts throughout the state, an important  contribution that dwarfs the importance of the paltry sum of funding ($7 million). The Rec Trails program funds off-road bicycling routes, sometimes providing key transportation links and always promoting bicycle recreation (a mode of entry for many eventual everyday bicyclists). Any fuThe Governor’s consolidation proposal came with absolutely no guidance to the California Transportation Commission regarding how the state’s portion is to be allocated.

In the long run, we support the consolidation because it makes it easier to do bigger things with the state’s transportation dollars. The ATP’s relatively large size creates a bigger political profile. Policy makers are more likely to pay attention to a $134 million ATP than they are a $7.2 million BTA and a campaign to increase the size of the ATP by 50{850a63fa8a72bae4d6bfa3f1eda9f619cddace10f9053ede128e2914f9ca5a15}, if victorious, will win $67 miIlion more for bike/ped safety while a campaign to increase the BTA by an equivalent margin will just win $3.6 million. The larger program also means we are no longer restricted to funding small projects here and there. We can fund large projects that will transform communities. The consolidation gives us the chance to “start from scratch” and completely revise how we invest in bicycle infrastructure.

Therefore, with the support of the state’s affiliated bicycle advocacy organizations, we are communicating the following position to the Governor and the Legislature.

1. Preserve the existing programs for now, and hold a call for projects immediately.  The delay in funding bicycle infrastructure during this ongoing debate is too long.

2. Develop specific rules for the new Active Transportation Program that preserve the benefits of existing programs: the safe routes to school program (especially the non-infrastructure portion), the recreational trails program, and the bicycle transportation account (small projects).

3. Appoint a dedicated staff person at the California Transportation Commission to manage the new program and hold a stakeholder-led process to develop new guidelines for the ATP.

4. Increase the size of the ATP every year by 10-50{850a63fa8a72bae4d6bfa3f1eda9f619cddace10f9053ede128e2914f9ca5a15}.

https://www.calbike.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/calbike-logo.png 0 0 Zac https://www.calbike.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/calbike-logo.png Zac2016-08-11 18:34:492018-08-11 21:27:06We win more bike funding but how will the state spend it?

Latest News

  • California State Capitol
    CalBike’s Legislative Agenda at the Halfway PointJune 11, 2025 - 2:56 pm
  • Complete Streets bill passes
    CalBike Works with Caltrans to Move Complete Streets ForwardJune 11, 2025 - 2:48 pm
  • California highway boondoggles
    California’s Budget Prioritizes Freeway Expansion Over Safe StreetsJune 9, 2025 - 5:00 pm
Follow a manual added link

Get Email Updates

Follow a manual added link

Join Calbike

  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to X
  • Link to LinkedIn
  • Link to Mail
  • Link to Instagram

About Us

Board
Careers
Contact Us
Financials & Governance
Local Partners
Privacy Policy
Staff
State & National Allies
Volunteer

Advocacy

California Bicycle Summit
E-Bike
Legislative Watch
Past and Present Projects
Report: Incomplete Streets
Sign On Letters

Resources

Maps & Routes
Crash Help and Legal Resources
Quick-Build Bikeway Design Guide
Report: Complete Streets
All Resources

Support

Ways to give
Become a Member
Donor Advised Funds
Donate a Car
Business Member

News

Blog
CalBike in the News
Press Releases

© California Bicycle Coalition 2025

1017 L Street #288
Sacramento, CA 95814
© California Bicycle Coalition 2025

Scroll to top